Note: This article has been summarized and adapted from a previous DP Review thread. My thanks to all who contributed and helped me improve my understanding of metering and exposure.
Disclaimer: This isn't an attempt to poo-pooh my D80 or anyone else's. Just a try at learning something new.
The following experiments follow the same approach. First start off with Sunny 16 (ISO100, f/16, 1/100sec) in Manual mode to get us in the ball-park, leaving metering out of the equation, then adjust from the Sunny 16 exposure until a capture that more accurately represents the lighting of the actual scene is achieved. For my D80, in most cases, this adjusted exposure was around 1 stop up (f/11) from Sunny 16. With this adjusted exposure in hand, I then moved on to Center-Weighed metering (CWM), set aperture priority to f/16 and collected the exposure, and set shutter priority to 1/100 sec and collected the exposure. I repeated this for Matrix Metering (MXM) and compared results.
The idea here was not to "diss" either of the metering systems, but rather to throw a couple of lighting situations at them to see how they handled them -- reference information on how to use them best in the future. If anything, this experiment (test, if you want to call it that), shows that good knowledge of lighting situations, no matter what approach to exposure pre-assessment I use, is required to make the necessary adjustments and achieve a good capture.
On to the tests... uhm... experiments.
Equipment used: Nikon D80, with 24-85mm AF f/2.8-4 lens, mounted on tripod (sorry Ken Rockwell) to produce consistently framed shots.
The Sunny 16 f/11 exposure came closest to the actual scene with regards to exposure of the mid to high tones (grass and sky). Compare against the exposure against the CWM and MXM exposures and you will see CWM over-exposes by 1/3 stop and MXM by 2/3. Neither of these did well because of the high contrast, and MXM in particular was biased by the AF focus point on that palm trunk in the center, which, although under full sun, tends toward the dark tone range of the scale.
This next scene is not as contrasty as our previous one. Unfortunately, the photographer, dodo that he is, focused dead center, where a darker spot appears. Since MXM biases for the AF point, this choice led to over-exposure as well. This time we only show the Sunny 16 shot and the adjusted, f/11 shot for simplicity. Once again, we select f/11 as our baseline for comparison against metered results.
Now I moved in closer to a group of flowers and repeated the same battery of tests. The focus point this time was one of the flowers on the left-bottom corner of the frame.
At last, the CWM exposure agrees with adjusted Sunny 16 (Sunny 11) exposure, and MXM didn't do too bad, over-exposing by 1/3 stop.
Next I selected a scene with a range of green tones, still under full sun, but perhaps a bit more challenging in terms of contrast. And this is a prickly subject, so what better subject could I select? Note that for this case, I adjusted the Sunny 16 exposure with shutter speed (to maintain DOF), and selected an adjusted exposure at 1/80 (+1/3EV) rather than the usual f11 (+1EV).
Once more CWM agrees with my assessment, but MXM falls +2/3 stops away.
For this next more evenly lit scene, results were very close. Here I didn't take the full battery of shots, just enough to show the closeness of the results. This is the type of situation where CWM and MXM do equally well. Then it's up to me (us) to adjust to get the exposure we want either in camera or with PP.
![]() Manual, ISO100, f/16, 1/100sec |
![]() Manual, ISO100, f/14, 1/100sec |
![]() Aperture Priority, CWM, ISO100, f/16, 1/160sec |
![]() Aperture Priority, MXM, ISO100, f/16, 1/100sec |
Some inconclusive musings before we leave this subject:
Take away lesson: know your tools and select the right one for the job. Just like you wouldn't cut wood with a drill or drill holes with a circular saw, don't expect that MXM or CWM will "cut it" or "drill it" in every situation.